Cases 21 - 30 of 3,670
STAGGERS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHARRARD STAGGERS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CANDICE BROSE, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
DIXON v. SHIVER et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
JOEY DIXON
Defendant:
BLAKE SHIVER and GEORGIA STATE PATROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USSERY v. HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
DONALD J USSERY, JR
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA and MARK DANIEL HEBERLIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LATIMORE v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
AYAD S LATIMORE
Defendant:
MIKAL JONES, ASHLEY N CUELLAR, DAVID HARDGRAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN and Larry L. Thomas Jr
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
