Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 26,269
MURRAY v. COLVIN et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff: ALBERT GORDON MURRAY
Defendant: JUDGE VERDA COLVIN, SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, TOMMY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
FOX v. BULKLEY et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: JOHN E FOX
Defendant: LEVI J BULKLEY and ALLIED PRODUCTION GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ASHLEY v. SHEPPARD
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff: JUSTIN SINCALIR ASHLEY
Defendant: STAN SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PACHECO v. FERNANDEZ et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: YARY PACHECO
Defendant: Julio C. Fernandez, LML Express NC LLC and RIS Risk Management Services
Type: Contract Insurance
DOE 4A et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 4A, JANE DOE 4B and MINOR DOE 4
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
ALEXANDER v. O'MALLEY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff: CAROLYN L ALEXANDER
Defendant: MARTN J O'MALLEY, RYAN YOUNG, AMANDA STEVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: IVAN BRYSON
Defendant: PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?