Cases 31 - 40 of 1,135,367
Sonnemann v. Anthem Previously Known as Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield
as 8:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Sonnemann
Defendant:
Anthem Previously Known as Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Ekpenyong v. Xulon Press, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ekpenyong
Defendant:
Xulon Press, Inc., Salem Media Group, Inc., Stuart W. Epperson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
RICMIC, LLC v. Sentrics, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
RICMIC, LLC
Defendant:
Sentrics, Inc., Sentrics Holdings, LLC and Silversphere, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HENDERSON v. STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD, et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA PAROLE BOARD and TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. MILLER HARDWARE COMPANY, LLC
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEAN RUSSELL
Defendant:
MILLER HARDWARE COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Peach State Roofing, Inc. v. DeLaurier Roofing and Renovation, LLC d/b/a Peach State Roofing
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Peach State Roofing, Inc.
Defendant:
DeLaurier Roofing and Renovation, LLC d/b/a Peach State Roofing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
