Cases 31 - 40 of 50,130
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Anthony Quamaine Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carty v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Carty
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bozier v. Warden of SCI-Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Petitioner:
Michael Bozier
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Dallas and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Posey v. Brittain et al
as 3:2024cv00730
Petitioner:
Ajani Posey
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tejada v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Yoder et al
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Lieutenant Yoder, C.O. Lazicki and Hearing Examiner Yodis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. USA
as 3:2024cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Carey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FLOOD v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MICHAEL FLOOD
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01805
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOOMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
