Cases 31 - 40 of 66,631
Easton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Easton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
as 4:2024cv00405
Petitioner:
Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent:
Federal Medical Center Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ross v. USA
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeremy Damon Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Contreras-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jose Contreras-Hernandez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Magee v. Hooper et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Covonta Magee
Respondent:
Tim Hooper and Liz Murrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Miss
as 3:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Terry E. Johnson, III
Respondent:
Miss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v Barnes
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Forrest Thomas, III
Respondent:
Timothy Barnes and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Derrick Nelson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Supreme Court of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Perry Jackson
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Probation Gulfport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Christian Johnson
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
