Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Cases 31 - 40 of 17,575
United States of America v. Isom
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James Isom
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Ellis
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Iesha Ellis
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Cole et al v. Watkins
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff: Robert Cole, Jr. and Patricia Cole
Defendant: Barbara A. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States of America v. Thomas
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Tameisha Thomas
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Johnson v. Miss
as 3:2024cv00128
Petitioner: Terry E. Johnson, III
Respondent: Miss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v Barnes
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Forrest Thomas, III
Respondent: Timothy Barnes and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holliday v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Nicholas Stephen Holliday
Defendant: Monroe County, Mississippi and Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Finley et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff: Teresa Harris
Defendant: Christopher Finley and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Pugh
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Chrezondria Quisha Pugh
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?