Cases 31 - 40 of 17,605
Noe v. Grainger County et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Glenn Noe
Defendant:
Grainger County, Grainger Co Sheriff James Harville and Cody Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Kelly v. Advance Financial et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Henderson Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Advance Financial and Wendy's of Bowling Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashbrook v Meigs County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ashbrook
Defendant:
Meigs County, TN, State of Tennessee, Attorney Casey Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 2:2024cv02302
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Smith
Defendant:
Virginia M. Alexander, Robert Duck and Janeen R. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
