Cases 31 - 40 of 24,856
Moumouni v. Chester County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rose Moumouni and Rose B. Moumouni
Defendant:
Chester County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Joshua Robinson v. Seay et al
as 6:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
David Seay, Brian Johnson, Anthony Basile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Glover v. Brian Sterling
as 6:2024cv02172
Plaintiff:
Wallace Glover
Defendant:
Director Brian P Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Alston v. Gallant Et AL
as 0:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Londell Lashun Alston
Defendant:
Andrew W. Gallant Et AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Reed v. Hampton
as 3:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Lavern Justin Reed
Defendant:
Emily W Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Orr v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Richland County Sheriff's Office and SC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kimner v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The, Berkeley County South Carolina and William J. Wylie, Jr.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Muhammad v. Carroll et al
as 1:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
James Muhammad
Defendant:
Judge Tracy Carroll, Officer Hall, Officer Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McGill v. Skeels
as 2:2024cv01973
Plaintiff:
Lamar Jabbar McGill
Defendant:
Officer Skeels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. USA
as 4:2024cv01952
Petitioner:
Marquarus Quachan Da-Whan White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
