Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Martinez v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01820
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jhon D. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Martinez v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2020cv01785
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Carmen Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Martinez v. USA
as 3:2020cv01692
Plaintiff:
Wilmer Martinez
Defendant:
United States Of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mendez et al v. NEHDS Logistics LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00896
Defendant:
ABC Corps, NEHDS Logistics LLC and Jane & John Does
Plaintiff:
Damian Mendez, Jose Antonio Martinez Jimenez and Cristian Taveras
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Martinez v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00891
Plaintiff:
Norberto Martinez, Jr.
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Mendez et al v. Bob's Discount Furniture LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00849
Defendant:
ABC Corps, John Does, Bob's Discount Furniture LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Damian Mendez and Jose Antonio Martinez Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Martinez-Brooks et al v. Easter et al
as 3:2020cv00569
Petitioner:
Rejeanne collier, Dianthe Martinez-Brooks, Kenneth Cassidy and others
Respondent:
D. Easter and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baisden v. Hartford et al
as 3:2020cv00398
Defendant:
C. Clark, Ashley Martinez, V. Duarte and others
Plaintiff:
Blanchani Baisden and Blanchand Baisden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
