Cases 31 - 40 of 190
Custer v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, Joseph Needham, Rhonda Gyton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnside v. Kientzle et al
as 1:2022cv01126
Plaintiff:
Brian A Burnside
Defendant:
Brandon Kientzle, Jeffrey Hinshaw, Terry Muench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckett v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Robert D Luckett
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, Joseph M Neeham, Ronda Y Guyton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckett v. Asbell et al
as 1:2022cv01093
Plaintiff:
Robert Luckett
Defendant:
Brian Asbell, Joseph Needham, Ronda Guyton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYER v. SCI SHARED SERVICES INC et al
as 5:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
GLORIA BOYER
Defendant:
SCI SHARED SERVICES INC doing business as MACON MEMORIAL PARK FUNERAL HOME AND CEMETERY, GEORGIA CEMETERY SERVICES LLC, DAVID ASBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Love v. Tiffany et al
as 1:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
George E Love
Defendant:
Tiffany, Britany, . Trisha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Asbell
as 1:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Chauncie J Lewis
Respondent:
Brian Asbell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Guyton et al
as 1:2022cv01050
Plaintiff:
Qwanell S Jones
Defendant:
Ronda Guyton, . Jones, Angel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asbell v. West, et al.
as 1:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Anthony Asbell
Defendant:
Mr. West, Autom Hamon, Tonya McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Hoos et al
as 1:2021cv01356
Plaintiff:
Ronnie B Nelson
Defendant:
Jodi Hoos, Dave Gast, Brian Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
