Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Asbell et al v. Michael Del Piero Good Design, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv09367
Plaintiff:
Yale Asbell and Audrey Asbell
Defendant:
Michael Del Piero Good Design, Michael Del Piero and Michael Del Piero Good Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 294 Breach of Contract
Irvin v. Exeter Finance
as 1:2023cv13873
Plaintiff:
Tyrae Irvin
Defendant:
Golf Mill Chevrolet, Asbel Diaz Ruiz, Nathaniel Devitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ASBELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
ALEX M. ASBELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
John Custer v. Chris Watkins, et al
as 23-2115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CUSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS WATKINS, Sheriff, BRIAN ASBELL, CARMISHA TURNER, Superintendent and others
John Custer v. Brian Asbell, et al
as 23-1644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CUSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN ASBELL, Sheriff, NURSE TRISHA, SALLY FOLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
