Cases 31 - 40 of 95
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2018mc00086
Respondent:
ANNEKA P. COLLINS, JULIE A. HORNE, CLERK OF COURT and others
Petitioner:
MAURA M. ROLL, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HAMILTON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2018cv01158
Defendant:
WENDY POHLHAUS, LESLIE PARSONS, CHANNING PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLE v. WORTHAM et al
as 1:2018cv00858
Plaintiff:
ARTAVIAS COLE
Defendant:
BOB WORTHAM, RACHEL GROVE and MIKE LAIRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
VAN ALLEN v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., JOHN J. FASO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02471
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COLE, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VASQUEZ v. DOE et al
as 1:2017cv02194
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, TERENCE SUTTON and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE T. VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT et al
as 1:2017cv01894
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. ADAMS
Defendant:
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT, R. GUY COLE, COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SUBPOENA MATTER et al v. COLE
as 1:2017mc01904
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant:
TIM COLE
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
DOE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv02159
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEAN PERRY, STEPHEN GRIMM and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
