Cases 31 - 40 of 119
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY
as 2:2016cv01498
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WARDEN OR SUPTENTDENT et al
as 2:2016cv01504
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
WARDEN OR SUPTENTDENT and CLEVELAND OHIO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2016cv01486
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF DIRECTOR SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA CHIEF DIRECTOR, PENNSYLVANIA CHIEF DIRECTOR OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WARDEN ALLEGHENY JAIL
as 2:2016cv01490
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLEGHENY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. HIGHMARK
as 2:2016cv01364
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
HIGHMARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. RASE'S SHOP 'N SAVE OWNERS
as 2:2016cv01366
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
RASE'S SHOP 'N SAVE OWNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CHIEF POAST MASTER GENERAL
as 2:2016cv01365
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CHIEF POAST MASTER GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA et al
as 2:2016cv01328
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
DEFENTS AN OWNERS WALMART CORPRACTIO OF PENNSYLVNIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH et al
as 2:2016cv01326
Plaintiff:
DEWITT THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
MERCY BEHAIVOR HEALTH, CHRIS CHRISTIFER and BRENDA HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
