Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Medley v. Shelby County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert Medley
Defendant:
Shelby County, Kentucky, Rob Rothenberger, Bobby Waits and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dixie Gomez , Florentino Gomez-Gonzalez , Lechia Daniel and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lee v. USA
as 5:2012cv07220
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Doyle Lamont Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aga v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00356
Plaintiff:
Nicolae Aga , Needa Alexander , Sue Aubert and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
Herbert Samuel Christensen, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Deborah Hickey, Jason Terris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Day et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Day , Leonard Haslag , James McCormick and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., Paul C. Orberson, Jeff Orberson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doyle v. SSA
as 2:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kurt Doyle
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Roberts v. SSA
as 6:2008cv00362
Plaintiff:
Doyle Roberts
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Doyle et al v. City of Murray
as 5:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Kevin Doyle, Kevin Doyle, Kevin Doyle and others
Defendant:
City of Murray
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Estate of Edna P. Bedwell et al
as 5:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of Edna P. Bedwell, Arthur E. Bedwell, Jr., Mary Bedwell and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
