Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Acosta et al. v. Unlimited Drywall, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02147
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Unlimited Drywall, Inc. , Unlimited Drywall, LLC and Cayetano Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Acosta v. Holloway et al
as 1:2017cv01278
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Mark Holloway, Meridian Medical Staffing, Inc. and Meridian Medical Staffing, Inc. Group Health Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Acosta v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv02266
Petitioner:
Gabriel Alexander Acosta
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarro v. Denver Sheriff Department
as 1:2016cv02120
Plaintiff:
Ibin Acosta Navarro
Defendant:
Denver Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garary-Acosta v. Sheridan Police Department et al
as 1:2016cv01075
Plaintiff:
Christian A. Garary-Acosta
Defendant:
Sheridan Police Department and J. Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00659
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Acosta v. Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin
as 1:2014cv02275
Defendant:
Viking Insurance Company of Wisconsin
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03429
Plaintiff:
Marie Acosta
Defendant:
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Daniels
as 1:2013cv03070
Petitioner:
Daniel Acosta
Respondent:
Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cleveland v. City of Brighton, Colorado, et al
as 1:2012cv02670
Defendant:
City of Brighton, Colorado, Clint Blackhurst, Valerie Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Kindra Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
