Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A.M. v. Lebarge et al
as 1:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
A. M.
Defendant:
Susan Labarge , Margaret Mines-Hornbeck and A. Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A.M. v. Labarge et al
as 1:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
A.M.
Defendant:
Susan Labarge, Margaret Mines-Hornbeck and Arthur Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acosta-Velarde v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Francisco Acosta-Velarde
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. 2007 Chevrolet Suburban et al
as 1:2010cv01125
Defendant:
2007 Chevrolet Suburban
Claimant:
Rafael Medina-Martinez and Edgar Acosta Lopez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Duttle et al v. Childress et al
as 2:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Duttle, Sharon Duttle and Shaun Duttle
Defendant:
Curtis Childress, Robin Gojkovich, Carlos Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. 2007 Chrysler 300 Touring et al
as 1:2010cv00246
Defendant:
2007 Chrysler 300 Touring, 2004 Ford F150 XLT and $7,300.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Erik Alonso-Martinez, Nora Alonso, Manuel Salazar and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Acosta-Vigil v. Delorme-Gaines
as 1:2009cv00929
Petitioner:
Anthony Acosta-Vigil
Respondent:
Angela Delorme-Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Acosta-Vigil
as 6:2009cv00923
Petitioner:
Anthony Acosta-Vigil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gabaldon v Acosta et al
as 1:2009cv00696
Plaintiff:
Annine Gabaldon
Defendant:
Jessica Acosta, Jeffrey Maldonado, Zeke Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
