Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Herman v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00307
Petitioner:
Max Bradley Herman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chicoine et al v. Wellmark, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00210
Plaintiff:
Bradley A. Chicoine , Bradley A. Chicoine, D.C., P.C. , Mark A. Niles and others
Defendant:
Wellmark, Inc. and Wellmark Health Plan of Iowa, Inc.
Intervenor_defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453
Norton v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 1:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Bradley L Norton
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Genesis Health System, et al
as 3:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Scott E Jones and Shilo M Jones
Defendant:
Genesis Health System, Rhonda Hance, Kim Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Cordes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv02104
Plaintiff:
Bradley W Cordes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bradley v. Herman et al
as 4:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
LeRoy T. Bradley
Defendant:
Shawn Herman, Dusty Ranies-Chaplain and City of Des Moines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchcroft v. Palmer et al
as 5:2016cv04095
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Hutchcroft
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Cory Turner, Shannon Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00119
Petitioner:
Richard Bradley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Hollesen et al
as 5:2016cv04063
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelly Lynn Hollesen and Bradley J Behrens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
