Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Potts v. Cumb. Co. Sherriff et al
as 2:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Potts
Defendant:
Cumb. Co. Sherriff, Butch Burgess and (f/n/u) Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. Cumb. Co. Sherriff et al
as 1:2010cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Potts
Defendant:
Cumb. Co. Sherriff, Butch Burgess and Unknown Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Herdon Potts and John David Potts
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Walden Resources, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Walden Resources, LLC, Daniel F Potts and ZTX Drilling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Griffith v. Smith et al
as 3:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
James W. Griffith
Defendant:
Tanya Smith, Flora Jean Holland, Kodihall Channabasappa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Eric Eugene Gilmore
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood, Daniel Prichard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2009mc00008
Plaintiff:
Eric Eugene Gilmore
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Cherry Lindamood, Daniel Prichard and others
Griffith v. Smith et al
as 3:2009mc00035
Plaintiff:
James W. Griffith
Defendant:
Tanya Smith, Flora Jean Holland, Kodihall Channabasappa and others
Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. Walden Resources, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Bituminous Casualty Corporation
Defendant:
Walden Resources, LLC, Amwes Exploration, LLC and Daniel Potts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
