Cases 31 - 40 of 65
QUICK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03698
Petitioner:
G. HEATH QUICK
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 3:2013cv00067
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORREST v. SAUERS
as 1:2012cv00318
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, CERT ATTACK GUARDS, STAFF AND GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLINTIC v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv06642
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCCLINTIC
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS , JOHN WETZEL , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. RADLE et al
as 2:2012cv01096
Plaintiff:
ANDRE DAVIS
Defendant:
RADLE, FARRANTI, QUICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Sauers et al
as 3:2012cv00044
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORREST v. NEDAB et al
as 2:2011cv07773
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant:
NEDAB, HORN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUICK v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54973
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E QUICK
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
QUICK et al v. TEXACO INC.
as 2:2011cv47429
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. QUICK and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
TEXACO INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. SAUERS et al
as 1:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MILLER
Defendant:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, QUICK, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
