Cases 31 - 40 of 344
DEMETRIUS D BELLAMY v. LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D Bellamy
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD, WARDEN CHERYL STEBERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
CLARK v. KALTESKI et al
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
SHELBY TYRONE CLARK and SHELBY TYRONE CLARK, JR.
Defendant:
KENNETH KALTESKI, EMIL SOFIA, LILLIAN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
RAMOS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04255
Plaintiff:
NELSON RAMOS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON et al v. LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2021cv03620
Plaintiff:
DONTAIE ANDERSON, JAWON H. JOHNSON, KAMAR THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, KYLE RUSSEL, JANINE DONATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos-Ramos v. FMH Conveyors, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv02754
Defendant:
FMH Conveyors, LLC and DURAVANT, LLC
Plaintiff:
Margarita M. Burgos-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01921
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS-SOTO et al v. C.R.BARD et al
as 2:2021cv01504
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAMOS-SOTO and SYLANA RAMOS-SOTO
Defendant:
C.R.BARD and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
