Cases 31 - 40 of 149
Diaz v. Nash
as 3:2018cv00823
Defendant:
Cheron Y. Nash
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Melvin Alexander Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 3:2018cv00223
Defendant:
Unum Group, UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and John Does 1-50
Plaintiff:
Susan Y. Parsons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ritchey v. Levi et al
as 1:2018cv00335
Plaintiff:
Ken Ritchey
Defendant:
Clark J. Levi, Alvix Laboratories, LLC and John Doe Defendants A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y and Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
O'Flynn v. Berard Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Tracey O'Flynn
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants X,Y, and Z, James L. Houghton and Berard Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blunt v. Weill, Sr. et al
as 3:2018cv00641
Defendant:
Barbara Dunn, Jim Hood, Brice R. White and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charlie Blunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKever v. Benus et al
as 1:2018cv00288
Defendant:
John and Jane Does A;B;C;D;E;F; and G, John W. Benus, Corporations X, Y, and Z and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. McKever, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bogan v. Nash
as 3:2018cv00576
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Bogan, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Cheron Y. Nash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
