Cases 31 - 40 of 854
Sivak v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2023cv06249
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
William A. Fletcher and Mark J. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivak v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennett and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bennett v. Newsom et al
as 3:2023cv05905
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Galvin Newsom, John Detar, Tiffany Franko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keeley Abram et al v. City of Los Angeles, California
as 2:2023cv09565
Plaintiff:
Keeley Abram, Robert Aceves, Brian Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207 Maximum Hours
Christopher S. Bennett v. NDEX West LLC et al
as 2:2023cv09367
Plaintiff:
Christopher S Bennett and Christopher S. Bennett
Defendant:
NDEX West LLC, Michael Barrett, James Frappier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
