Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Ferrell v. Thom et al
as 5:2017cv05086
Plaintiff:
Justin Lamar Ferrell
Defendant:
Kevin Thom, Moore, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulrazzak v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2017cv04058
Plaintiff:
Haider Salah Abdulrazzak
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Aaron Miller, SD. Bd. of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Northwest Pipe Fittings, Inc.
as 5:2016cv05100
Plaintiff:
Wallie Clark
Defendant:
Northwest Pipe Fittings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meat Lodge West LLC et al v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv04123
Plaintiff:
Meat Lodge West LLC , Meat Lodge LLC and Lewis & Clark Meat Lodge LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Clark v. South Dakota et al
as 4:2016cv04054
Petitioner:
Rocky Jerome Clark, Sr.
Respondent:
South Dakota, Lori Ehlers, Susan M. Sabers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv04025
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Crystal Johnson, Minnehaha County, Second Judicial Circuit Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis & Clark Specialty Hospital, LLC et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2015cv04178
Plaintiff:
Lewis & Clark Specialty Hospital, LLC and Lewis & Clark Specialty Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Hall, Wasatch Surgical LLC and Richardson Van Leeuwen Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clark v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2015cv04132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
State of South Dakota and Minnehaha County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv04128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
