Cases 31 - 40 of 103
McLeod v. F.O. Day et al
as 1:2019cv03447
Defendant:
F.O. Day, Bob Rider and Michael Day
Plaintiff:
Junior McLeod
Loew v. DAI Global, LLC
as 8:2019cv03352
Defendant:
DAI Global, LLC
Plaintiff:
Beverly E. Loew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Capers et al v. Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, LLC
as 1:2019cv02911
Plaintiff:
Olde City Day School 1930 South Broad Street, LLC, Pitter Patter Learning Center, LLC, The Olde City Day School, LLC and others
Defendant:
Kiddie Academy Domestic Franchising, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pang v. Adult Day Health, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02283
Defendant:
National Mentor Holdings, Inc., Adult Day Health, Inc. and Rainbow Adult Day Care Center of Montgomery County, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Pang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Woodmore House Assisted Living, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01468
Defendant:
We Care Adult Day Care Services, Inc., Quality Connection Transporation, Inc., Gwen Terry and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Day v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Charles Blain Day, Jr.
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Day Financial LLC v. United Services Automobile Association
as 8:2017cv03317
Plaintiff:
New Day Financial LLC
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
New Day Financial, LLC v. United Services Automobile Association
as 1:2017cv03317
Plaintiff:
New Day Financial, LLC
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Day v. Stevens et al
as 1:2017cv02638
Plaintiff:
Matthew Day
Defendant:
Julian Stevens, III and TAK Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
