Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Mays v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2018cv02355
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Bridgett M. Mays
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Cao et al
as 6:2017cv01310
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thong Cao, Mai Cao, Van T. Le and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Mathews et al
as 5:2017cv04106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Debra Mathews, Jacob Almon Robinson, Raymon Glenn Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Slife et al
as 5:2017cv04058
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Judy Slife, Mitchell Garner, Michael R. Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Wedel et al
as 5:2017cv04044
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David L. Wedel, Jr., Candance Calvert, David Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
May (ID 96951) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2017cv03095
Petitioner:
William D. May
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mays et al v. Kansas City, Kansas Police Department
as 2:2017cv02132
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mays and Lora Mays
Defendant:
Kansas City, Kansas Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Arbelo et al
as 2:2017cv02048
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose E. Arbelo, Carmen Arbelo, Donny Arbelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
