Cases 31 - 40 of 323
May v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00396
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Timothy E May
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Howard v. May
as 1:2023cv01174
Petitioner:
Raysean Howard
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Blackmon et al
as 1:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Andrey L. Bridges
Defendant:
Patricia A. Blackmon, Mary J. Boyle, Frank D. Celebrezze, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mays v. Warrensville Social Security
as 1:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Juan Ahmad Mays
Defendant:
Warrensville Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houle v. Marion Police Department, et al
as 3:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Logan Houle
Defendant:
Marion Police Department, Officer Dana Jagger, Officer Justin May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cherry v. May
as 5:2023cv01164
Petitioner:
Elliott J. Cherry
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacobs v. May
as 4:2023cv01050
Petitioner:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HealthCare Facility Management v. Vega
as 1:2023cv00248
Counter Defendant:
HealthCare Facility Management
Defendant:
Sherra May Vega
Plaintiff:
HealthCare Facility Management doing business as CommuniCare Family of Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Mance v. Fannie May et al
as 5:2023cv01106
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ellis Mance
Defendant:
Fannie May and Sara Ravas Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Green v. Warden May
as 3:2023cv00921
Petitioner:
David L. Green
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
