Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv06803
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rowland Brooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
McRae v. Rowland
as 6:2017cv06774
Plaintiff:
Troy McRae
Defendant:
T. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corporate Risk Holdings, LLC v. Rowlands
as 1:2017cv05225
Plaintiff:
Corporate Risk Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Sharon T. Rowlands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowland v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04636
Plaintiff:
Kelli Boyt Rowland
Defendant:
Bayer healthcare pharmaceuticals, inc., Bayer AG and Bayer Oy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thornton v. Dysard et al
as 9:2016cv01358
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thornton
Defendant:
Daniel Dysard, Brian June, Christopher Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02021
Plaintiff:
William Rowland
Defendant:
Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC, VNR Finance Corp., Vanguard Natural Gas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Rowland v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05367
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rowland
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowland v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00878
Plaintiff:
Andrea Rowland
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amador v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
as 1:2011cv04326
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
schoppee, Cecelia A Morgan, Amanda J Shimko and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Cynthis Reames and Jacqueline E. Croom
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andrews v. Rowland et al
as 3:2014cv00851
Plaintiff:
Vernon H. Andrews
Defendant:
Dennis Rowland, Hillary R. Clinton and Jack Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
