Cases 31 - 40 of 12,990
Bethune v. Iagavino et al
as 1:2024cv01364
Defendant:
D.S.C.S. Nicklow, Correctional Officer Iagavino, C.H.C.A. Jon Altimus and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Julian Bethune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04081
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
BRENT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH et al v. CUMMINGS et al
as 2:2024cv03912
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH and MICHELLE SMITH
Defendant:
KRATOS ENERGY SOLUTIONS and CHARLES M. CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03944
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
GORDON BLAKE SMITH, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03969
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
KIMYANIA ARCELLA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Smith v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03868
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
Helene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 5:2024cv03868
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
Helene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03762
Plaintiff:
Brian Smith
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KREIS v. SMITH
as 5:2024cv03686
Plaintiff:
AUGUST BYRON KREIS, IV
Defendant:
OFFICER THOMAS SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
