Cases 31 - 40 of 1,337
CLARK v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04641
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SEWARD et al v. LUDDEN et al
as 3:2024cv06295
Plaintiff:
BARRY SEWARD, TRUDE SHERROD-POLAN and DOROTHY M. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CONSTANCE LUDDEN, THE CITY OF TRENTON, RACHEL HUNDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04582
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SHORES v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04651
Petitioner:
DEAN SHORES
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACKSTONE v. THOMPSON et al
as 3:2024cv06129
Plaintiff:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Defendant:
JUDGE RODNEY THOMPSON, JUDGE SUPTI BHATTACHARYA, BRIAN GILLSTOZZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BLACKSTONE v. PLATKIN et al
as 3:2024cv06127
Petitioner:
CLEVESTER BLACKSTONE
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. PLATKIN, N.J. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, N.J. STATE GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
