Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Loftis v. Ellis et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kirk Loftis
Defendant:
Jason Ellis, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newcomb Taysom v. O'bama et al
as 4:2013cv00451
Plaintiff:
Nicola Jo Newcomb Taysom
Defendant:
Barack O'bama, Joseph Biden, US Cabinet Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zuffa LLC DBA Ultimate Fighting Championship v. Thompson et al
as 1:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
Zuffa LLC
Defendant:
Kelly Thompson, Ann Ware and Mission Inn, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Thompson v. Blades
as 1:2013cv00101
Petitioner:
Steven Todd Thompson
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown et al v. Miller Brewing Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00605
Plaintiff:
Keith A Brown, Jeremy J Brown, Cory A Baugh and others
Defendant:
Miller Brewing Co., Anheuser-Busch Co., Adolph Coors Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Raney et al
as 1:2012cv00549
Petitioner:
Dallas Tyler Thompson
Respondent:
Gary Raney and Brian Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Idaho State Department of Corrections
as 1:2012cv00279
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Forrest Thompson
Respondent:
Idaho State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Thompson Creek Mining Co. et al
as 4:2011cv00639
Plaintiff:
Sherman Anderson
Defendant:
Thompson Creek Mining Co. and Psychemedics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brakke v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00455
Plaintiff:
Randolph E Brakke, Sr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections , ISCI, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chapungu Safaris et al
as 1:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Michael Von Jones
Defendant:
Chapungu Safaris, Raymond Townsend, Patricia Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
