Cases 31 - 40 of 441
Baker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00482
Plaintiff:
Andrew Baker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Raland J. Brunson
Defendant:
Alma S. Adams, Pete Aguilar, Colin Z. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
JLPR v. Utah Department of Agriculture and Food et al
as 2:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
JLPR
Defendant:
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food, Utah Division of Purchasing and General Services, State of Utah, The and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Tucker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Troy Earl Tucker
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Hirschi v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Janice M. Hirschi
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Bethke v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Plaintiff:
Barbara Bethke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Seegmiller v. Kijakazi
as 4:2021cv00069
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Chace Seegmiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Seddell v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00379
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Terry Keith Seddell
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Simpson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Turner v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00371
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Plaintiff:
Jeff Turner
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
