Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Reed v. Martinez et al
as 2:2015cv00142
Defendant:
Aramark and Peggy Martinez
Plaintiff:
Homer O Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Windorf v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv01821
Defendant:
Aramark, Clark County Detention Center, N. Kelso and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Windorf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. County of Las Vegas, Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv01658
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Attorney for the public, Budgeting Financial Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nicki Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
McDavis v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2014cv00918
Defendant:
Aramark, Clark County Detention Center and Clark County Detention Center Dental Department
Plaintiff:
Lawrence McDavis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petrie v. Aramark Corporation
as 3:2014cv00263
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Diella Petrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Petrie v. Aramark Corporation
as 2:2014cv00809
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Diella Petrie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Yates v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01725
Defendant:
Aramark, Inc., C.C.D.C., Clark County and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dietzmann v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Chief Donahue
Plaintiff:
Bart W Dietzmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
