Cases 31 - 40 of 52
RUSH v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00325
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUY v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES
as 2:2016cv00303
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES
Plaintiff:
DANTE D. GUY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDAVID v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00280
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and ARAMARK LLC
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SNYDER v. ARAMARK, LLC
as 2:2016cv00240
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and ARAMARK LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BEST v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00112
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES and ARAMARK LLC
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MARK BEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 3:2014cv02085
Plaintiff:
Charles R Knight, III
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Ron Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holycross v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2014cv01994
Plaintiff:
Raymond Holycross
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Mark Sevier, Mark Levenhagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush et al v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2014cv01949
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bush, Jr
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Mark Sevier, Mark Levenhagen and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handzlik v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Handzlik
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Aramark Food Services, Mark Sevier and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGER v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
as 1:2010cv01734
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, C/O TOMPSON and PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Plaintiff:
DAVID SINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
