Cases 31 - 40 of 46,668
Stone, Gregory v. SSM Health St. Mary's Hospital
as 3:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Gregory Edward Stone
Defendant:
SSM Health St. Mary's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cuello Ferreras, Herppis v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00406
Petitioner:
Herppis Cuello Ferreras
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter, Cornelius v. Schumacher, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Cornelius I. Hunter
Defendant:
Michael A. Schumacher, Jon M. Theisen, Peter J. Rindal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huber, Robert v. Hoy, Jared et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Robert Huber
Defendant:
Jared Hoy and Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lear, Robert v. City of Chetek Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Robert Lear
Defendant:
City of Chetek Police Department and Police Chief Ron Ambrozaitis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Klund v. USA
as 3:2024cv00402
Petitioner:
Craig Klund
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Blue, Susan v. Boetcher, David et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Blue
Defendant:
David Boetcher, Michael Killian, Thomas Lemens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Matushak
as 1:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Vance H Smith
Respondent:
Anthony Matushak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman, Andrew v. Radcliffe, Richard et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Andrew Charles Sherman
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Richard A. Radcliffe, District Attorney Kevin Croninger and Attorney Rachel Pisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake Ford Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Lake Ford Inc.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
