Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07469
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Adkins v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv04916
Plaintiff:
Kevin Adkins
Defendant:
Tina Everett, John/Jane Does 1-5, Ylka Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP OVERTIME LITIGATION
as 1:2011cv02461
Defendant:
Deloitte LLP, Deloitte & Touche LLP and Deloitte & Touche USA LLP
Plaintiff:
Dina Z. Gersten, Bani Wirk, Daniel R. Rossillon and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jason James
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Nicholas Mues
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Santana v. Adkins et al
as 1:2010cv08020
Plaintiff:
Anthony Santana
Defendant:
A. Adkins, R. Woody and J. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvez et al v. Aspen Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv04493
Plaintiff:
Jose Galvez, Eligio Hernandez, Douglas Lund and others
Defendant:
Aspen Corporation, Aspen Irrigation Inc., Management Consulting Laborers and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Pu et al v. Charles H. Greenthal Management Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv10084
Plaintiff:
Richard Pu and Richard Pu
Defendant:
Charles H. Greenthal Management Corp., Michaele McCarthy, Trafalgar House Condominium and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04355
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Bowen et al v. Sony Electronics Inc.
as 1:2007cv02307
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bowen, Joseph Bowen, Joseph Bowen and others
Defendant:
Sony Electronics Inc., Sony Electronics Inc. and Sony Electronics Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
