Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
McCauley et al v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02606
Plaintiff: Amber Lee McCauley and Michael McCauley
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01735
Petitioner: Stephanie Amber Smith
Respondent: USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01199
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
McCauley et al. v. The United States of America
as 1:2016cv00601
Plaintiff: Amber Lee McCauley and Michael McCauley
Defendant: The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672
Tegeler v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03489
Plaintiff: Shannon Amber Tegeler
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Back v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2015cv02937
Plaintiff: Amber Back
Defendant: Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Broadcast Music, Inc et al v. Demorett, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00883
Plaintiff: Broadcast Music, Inc , Concord Music Group, Inc. , Abkco Music, Inc and others
Defendant: Demorett, LLC and Amber A. Demorett-Perez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lee et al v. Riptide By The Bay, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03762
Plaintiff: Monica Lee , Christopher Wenzel , Amber Groves and others
Defendant: Riptide By The Bay, Inc., RRR 1 Investments LLC, Roger R. Rippel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anderson v. Voice of Choice, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00379
Plaintiff: Amber Anderson
Defendant: Voice of Choice, Inc. , Todd Stave and Wendy Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
TECH USA, Inc. v. Hoppel et al
as 1:2012cv02717
Defendant: Amber S Hoppel, Randstad US and Stephen E Brady
Plaintiff: TECH USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?