Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Joseph Dante and Gusmorino et al v. National Flood Insurance Program et al
as 1:2013cv06297
Plaintiff:
Josephine Aguoji, Sean Ahearn, Ismet Apdiroglu and others
Defendant:
W. Craig Fugate, Janet Napolitano and National Flood Insurance Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Amos v. Biogen Idec, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv06375
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Amos
Defendant:
Biogen Idec, Inc. and Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amos v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC
as 1:2013cv00584
Plaintiff:
Enid Amos
Defendant:
Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adebiyi v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adebiyi
Defendant:
Weedens E. Blanchard, Michael Campbell, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey v. Prometric Corp et al
as 6:2013cv06029
Plaintiff:
Amos Darryl Mackey
Defendant:
Prometric Corp, Carolyn Potts, Micheal Sawicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Phillips v. LaValley et al
as 9:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Ralph Buck Phillips
Defendant:
T. LaValley, J. Facteau, W. Allan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv06182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Phillips v. Artus et al
as 9:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Ralph Buck Phillips
Defendant:
Dale Artus, T. Pourpose, R. Mosely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kral et al v. Amos Poe
as 1:2011mc00402
Plaintiff:
Ivan Kral and Blank Generation, LLC
Defendant:
Amos Poe
Cause Of Action: M 18-302 Registration of Foreign Judgment
Stoltzfus v. Amish Woodworks, Inc.
as 3:2010cv01203
Plaintiff:
Amos K. Stoltzfus
Defendant:
Amish Woodworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
