Cases 31 - 40 of 411
Ocasio v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Brayan Ocasio
Defendant:
Robert Martin and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Angel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Warden and Deputy Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estremera v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Daniel Estremera
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Commissioner of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Cordaryl D Silva
Respondent:
Commissioner of Correction and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept of Correction, Wilson, Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis
as 24-414
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH STEPHENSON, (Class of One, Pro-se Petitioner)
Defendant:
CARLENE DAVIS, (D.O.C. Counselor Supervisor), ANGEL QUIROS, (Commissioner-Conn. Dept of Correction, BARONE, (Warden, MacDougall State Prison) and others
Jordan v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Angel Quiros, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Early v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Wayne Early
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Christopher Brunelle, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
