Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roberts v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2009cv12593
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Roberts
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Type:
Social Security
Rogers v. Sterling Heights, City of et al
as 2:2009cv10217
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Rogers
Defendant:
Sterling Heights, City of, David M Vinson, Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv12782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Andrews, et al v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, et al
as 2:2008x50280
Plaintiff:
J C Andrews, Ann Marie Arnicar, Tracy Billingslea and others
Defendant:
Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Jamahiriya Security Organization, Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Security Organization and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv10065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv15118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Meadows v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2007cv14793
Plaintiff:
Eldred B Meadows
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Dennis M Hayes, John Shea and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv13965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv12115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
