Cases 31 - 40 of 345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Steele v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Barbara Steele
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weltsch v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Barbara Weltsch
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lemay v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lemay
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
McGuinness v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Barbara McGuinness
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hanks v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hanks
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Hegermiller et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Michael Hegermiller and Ritchelle T. Hegermiller
Defendant:
Barbara Hegermiller-Smith and Lynn M. Kilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Mercier v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Barbara Mercier
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ryan v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Helen Barbara Ryan
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County and The Kania Law Firm, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
