Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Holmes v. Bonds
as 1:2014cv01394
Plaintiff: Jeffery Walston Holmes
Defendant: Mac Bonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff: Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant: City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Neal et al v. Appliance Warehouse of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00096
Plaintiff: Jared Neal , Jonathan Larson , Michael Donnley and others
Defendant: Appliance Warehouse of America, Inc. and Rashard Bond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bond v. Ablaseau et al
as 2:2013cv00462
Plaintiff: Curtis L. Bond
Defendant: Ralph Ablaseau, Kolongo, Kahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. Kolongo et al
as 2:2013cv00092
Plaintiff: Curtis L. Bond
Defendant: Doctor Kolongo and Mrs. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosquez v. Angel's Bail Bonds, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00972
Plaintiff: Anyeli Bosquez
Defendant: Angel's Bail Bonds, Inc. and Angel Michael Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rogers v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 2:2012cv00481
Plaintiff: Wilson O. Rogers
Defendant: Hampton Roads Regional Jail, Aramark Food Service, FMM & Naphcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges et al v. Federal-Mogul Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00362
Plaintiff: Tommy Lee Bonds, Jeffrey S. Hodges and John Paul Spangler
Defendant: Federal-Mogul Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Bonds v. Wigo Clinic LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff: Jonathan Bonds
Defendant: Wigo Clinic LLC and Sheri Link
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?