Cases filed in Florida
Cases 31 - 40 of 416
Bowen v. Blais et al
as 6:2023cv01088
Plaintiff: Kathleen I Bowen and Kathleen I. Bowen
Defendant: Aaron Blais, Matthew Stubbs, Dennis M Lemma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12827
Plaintiff: CYNTHIA BOWEN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff: STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bowen v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 6:2023cv00874
Plaintiff: Edward Bowen
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bowens v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00238
Petitioner: Jarvis Bernard Bowens
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BOWENS v. DUNS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv07353
Petitioner: E-YAGE BOWENS
Defendant: DUNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen et al v. Shore Excursion Group, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60585
Plaintiff: Kelli Bowen and Larry Bowen
Defendant: Shore Excursion Group, LLC, Swiss Travel Limited Corp. and Brisas de la Jungla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOWEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06537
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BOWEN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pickard v. Archer et al
as 6:2023cv00396
Plaintiff: William Glenn Pickard
Defendant: Phil Archer, Daniel Hernandez, Grant Malloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Pickard et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Defendant: William Glenn Pickard, City of Sanford, Philip Glen Archer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?