Cases 31 - 40 of 2,477
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BOWEN v. FROST et al
as 2:2021cv03521
Plaintiff:
VOLANDA BOWEN
Defendant:
MALE FROST, NC LEASING, INC., XYZ, CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowens v. Harry et al
as 1:2021cv01306
Petitioner:
Terrell Bowens
Respondent:
Laurel Harry, John Wetzel, Josh Shapiro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bowen v. Warden of Schuylkill County Prison et al
as 1:2021cv01153
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Warden of Schuylkill County Prison and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Petitioner:
Sean Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00802
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 2:2021cv02519
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00707
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bowens v. McGinley et al
as 3:2021cv00877
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
David Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AVELLA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC, et al
as 2:2021cv00534
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, JUUL LABS, INC,, ADAM BOWEN and others
Plaintiff:
AVELLA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MT. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00495
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
MT. LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
