Cases 31 - 40 of 48
James Burks, et al v. John Dylewski, et al
as 16-12387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A, BURKS, M.D., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and JAMES D. DAVENPORT, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. DYLEWSKI, M.D., BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., d.b.a. Baptist Health South Florida, d.b.a. Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-10094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Baptist Health South Florida, Inc. v. Leal Medical Center, LLC
as 1:2015cv21725
Plaintiff:
Baptist Health South Florida, Inc.
Defendant:
Leal Medical Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv23649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
Gentry Technology of SC Inc v. Baptist Health South Florida Inc
as 1:2014cv02127
Plaintiff:
Gentry Technology of SC Inc
Defendant:
Baptist Health South Florida Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv21803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv21411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv21049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Thomas v. Kendall Credit and Business Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv20284
Plaintiff:
Jessica Thomas
Defendant:
Kendall Credit and Business Service, Inc. and BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv23765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
