Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Chen v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00652
Petitioner:
Pei Feng Chen
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Peter D. Keisler, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ragsdale v. Barlow et al
as 3:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Roderick Ragsdale
Defendant:
Louis Barlow, Eddie Schaffin and Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Barlow et al
as 3:2007cv00615
Plaintiff:
Reuben Garrison
Defendant:
Lewis W. Barlow and Blanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sun v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00487
Petitioner:
Xi Di Sun
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Waffi v. Loiselle et al
as 1:2007cv00742
Petitioner:
Mustafa Waffi
Respondent:
Mary Loiselle, Lewis Barlow, Julie Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv00599
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Jabe, Dr. Teklu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Barlow et al
as 3:2007cv00284
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Leon Banks
Defendant:
Barlow and Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Barlow et al
as 3:2007cv00250
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee Morgan
Defendant:
Barlow and Edward Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Barlow et al
as 1:2007cv00384
Plaintiff:
Patricia B. Knight
Defendant:
Lt. Barlow and Dr. Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Barlow et al
as 7:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Patricia B. Knight
Defendant:
Barlow, Tony and Piedmont Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
