Cases 31 - 40 of 265
White v. CDCR and Board of Prison Term et al
as 4:2014cv01958
Plaintiff:
Diwon Deshawn White
Defendant:
CDCR and Board of Prison Term and Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeremy Brandon v. Board of Prison Terms, et al
as 14-55610
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER BRANDON
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, P. D. BRAZELTON and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Richard Gilman v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 14-15680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD M. GILMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., JONES MOORE, Board of Prison Terms, J. DAVIS and others
Richard Gilman v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 14-15613
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD M. GILMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., JONES MOORE, Board of Prison Terms, J. DAVIS and others
Clarence Hickman, Sr. v. County of Butte, et al
as 14-15517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE B. HICKMAN, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BOARD OF PRISON TERM and others
Carr v. Hill et al
as 5:2014cv00049
Petitioner:
Marion A. Carr
Respondent:
Rick Hill and Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hickman v. State of California
as 2:2013cv02156
Plaintiff:
Clarence B. Hickman, Sr.
Defendant:
State of California, County of Butte, Board of Prison Terms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kabede v. State of California Board of Prison Terms et al
as 3:2013cv03746
Petitioner:
Wondiyrad Kabede
Respondent:
State of California Board of Prison Terms and W. Knipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puerto v. Board of Prison Term
as 1:2013cv01097
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez Puerto
Respondent:
Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Board of Prison Terms
as 3:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
Larry Lionel White
Defendant:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.