Cases 31 - 40 of 46
James v. Bashaw et al
as 9:2012cv01112
Plaintiff:
Andrew James
Defendant:
Nicole Bashaw, Aubera Danleson, Richard Hillary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dunk v. Emma et al
as 7:2011cv04564
Plaintiff:
Rodney Van Dunk
Defendant:
Mark Emma, Robert Lancia and Peter Brower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dunk v. Emma et al
as 1:2011cv04564
Plaintiff:
Rodney Van Dunk
Defendant:
Mark Emma , Robert Lancia and Peter Brower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brower v. GE Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01020
Plaintiff:
Heather Brower
Defendant:
GE Healthcare, Inc., GE Healthcare AS, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02605
Plaintiff:
Janice Jackson
Defendant:
City of New York, Robert Brower, Mark Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2009cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Piven et al v. Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz L.L.P. et al
as 1:2008cv10578
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Piven and Brower Piven
Defendant:
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz L.L.P., Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz, L.L.P., Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abreu v. Graham et al
as 9:2008cv00855
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Harold Graham, Brian Fischer, Lucien J. LeClaire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pitter v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv01436
Plaintiff:
Phillip Pitter
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond Kelly, Robert Brower and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
