Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03849
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03701
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Shoan v. Mcaleenan et al
as 1:2020cv03457
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
AL Amin Shoan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ahmed v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv03330
Defendant:
Michael R. Pompeo, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ken Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
us department of homeland security and suman ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05450
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hossain v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv03058
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, US Department of Homeland Security, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Mamun Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Celestin v. U.S. Department State Bureau of Consular Affairs et al
as 1:2020cv00947
Defendant:
U.S. Department State Bureau of Consular Affairs and U.S. Embassy Port au Prince
Plaintiff:
George Beegmenton Celestin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00787
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00566
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
