Cases 31 - 40 of 258
COLLINS v. WARDEN
as 2:2021cv00278
Petitioner:
MARVIN COLLINS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DECKER v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv00253
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JAMIE WHEELER, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELFGEEH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00228
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
MUFID A. ELFGEEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ELFGEEH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00225
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
MUFID A. ELFGEEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRESSLEY et al v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv00202
Plaintiff:
NIJUL ALEXANDER, JAMES R. PRESSLEY, AMIN RICKER and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and T. J. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAFFER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILSON, KRUEGER, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SHAFFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AHMED v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2021cv00178
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER and U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. TRUMP ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT INCITEMENT OF INSURRECTION AT U.S.CAPITOL et al
as 1:2021cv00276
Respondent:
SEKOU MAAT, DESIGNATION AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION CENTER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ELFGEEH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2021cv00069
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
MUFID A. ELFGEEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STRONG v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY TERRE HAUTE, EMPLOYEES, CORRECTIONS OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
