Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Jasmine v. Cain et al
as 2:2010cv02742
Plaintiff:
Gill W Jasmine
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Rader et al
as 3:2010cv00241
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, Connie Kennedy, James M. LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Darrin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kately v. Cain et al
as 2:2010cv01057
Plaintiff:
Benedict Kately
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gordon v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv00210
Defendant:
Marie Anthony, Angelique D. Batiste, Tiffany Bryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Cain et al
as 3:2010cv00206
Respondent:
Burl N. Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bozeman v. Cain et al
as 2:2009cv08423
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Bozeman
Defendant:
Burl N Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vincent v. Spragg et al
as 3:2009cv00926
Plaintiff:
Harold Vincent
Defendant:
Melody Spragg, Burl N. Cain, Unknown Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jindal et al
as 3:2009cv00802
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ray Robinson
Defendant:
Bobby Jindal, James LeBlanc, Burl N. Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Cain et al
as 3:2009cv00775
Petitioner:
Keith R. Kennedy
Respondent:
Burl N. Cain and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade v. Cain et al
as 3:2009cv00695
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Wade
Defendant:
Burl N. Cain, John L. Calvert, Andrea D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
